Pre and post 5th August 2019, Kashmir. Promises and Betrayals. (Part-I)

DAILY TIMES

Pre and post 5th August 2019, Kashmir. Promises and Betrayals. (Part-I)

Justice (r) Manzoor Gilani

SEPTEMBER 12, 2019

Basis of Kashmir – India relationship

Basis of Indian claim on Kashmir is its rulers accession instrument dated 26/10/47 incorporated in article 370 of its constitution. Its constitution applies to the state through the special mechanism agreed by the state constituent Assembly and union of India through article 370 ( which was 306 A in draft constitution) . This mechanism is allowed by its constitution under article 2.

Art 370 allowed extending only such provisions of constitution through a presidential order with such modifications & exceptions from the union list , as corresponded to instrument of accession after consultation, and other provisions, after consent of the state government. The article is special and temporary to be abolished by president of India subject to ” recommendation of state’s constituent Assembly ” when relations are finally determined, not unilaterally.

That is why only article 1 of the constitution was extended to the state under article 370 , which defines the territories of India , On 26th of January 1950, when constitution of India was enforced though , Sheikh Abdullah, the sole leader and prime minister of Kashmir, had serious reservations against the draft passed by constituent Assembly , as it ran counter to instrument of accession which had delegated the powers of ” Defence, Foreign affairs and communication ” only to the union with a further stipulation that, ” Nothing in this instrument should be deemed to be commitment in any way as to acceptance of any future constitution of India , .” Rest was left for constituent assembly to determine . This was the first betrayal after manoeuvred accession.

State visa vis Indian constitution

State constituent assembly was elected in 1951. Sheikh Abdullah was managed to enter into an agreement with union , called Delhi agreement of 1952 . He was dismissed and detained soon thereafter in August 1953 . The constituent assembly framed state constitution in 1954 , dissolved in 1956 and the constitution was enforced in 1957. This was 2nd blatant betrayal.

In pursuance of Delhi agreement , a-flux of Indian constitution was extended to the state through constitutional application order 1954 on May 14, which also included art 35 A, guaranteeing a nominal special status . This was endorsed by constituent Assembly before its extinction. But 47 other orders were issued thereafter extending 268 out of 395 articles and 95 entries out of 97 of union list . None of them was approved by constituent Assembly . State Assembly in its autonomy report after Indra – Abdullah accord of 1975, unanimously demanded their scrapping and restoration of pre 1953 position, , but report was thrown in dust bin , support to him as chief minister was withdrawn by congress Govt of India . This is the third betrayal.

Special status enshrined in article 35 A , conferred the power upon state Assembly to define the rights of the residents of state called state subjects , to the exclusion of all others to acquire land, employment, scholarship in the state . This was challenged from day one by Sang Parwvar and remained part of its constitution as discriminatory and a challenge to integrity of India , although there are eight other Indian states enjoying similar protection under articles 371 to 371H, but they do not prick their conscience being Hindu states.

Modi intrusion

On his second term as pm withit’s powerful mandate , Modi lead BJP government ventured to make its dream of abolishing article 370 and all other privileges to the state , come true , which includes article 35 A also.

Court of India , hence before Though till date remaining a part of constitution, Article 370 is rendered redundant . It has changed the basic structure of constitution of India , which is never allowed by the Supreme

The president’s order of 5th August issued under article 370 very smartly applied entire constitution of India to the state by abolishing its special status , depriving it of its own constitution, flag, rights and privileges of its residents without expressly mentioning as such by amending article 367 of its constitution which defines different terms used in the Indian constitution .

5th August order ordains to read the ” constitution ” as “Constitution of India” “governor ” as the “government of the state ” and the ” legislative Assembly” as the constituent Assembly of the state” under article 367 . Later to pave the way for abrogation of article 370 by expected BJP dominate Assembly . The order is a fraud upon the constitution.

Through a bill presented in Raja Sabah on the same day for reorganisation, the state was downgraded into two union territories namely “Ladakh, ” comprising Kargil&Leh and ” Jammu & Kashmir”. Former without and later with legislative Assembly. The bill has become Act of parliament now.

Besides UN SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS & commitments of its leaders in parliament and around the world to hold plebiscite for ascertaining the will of people for future dispensation of the state , the presidential order as well as the reorganisation Act , are against the constitution of India and state constitutions as well. They don’t “correspond to instrument accession ” and are issued “without consultation and consent of government of the state”, which is not in seat , as the assembly stands dissolved and the government is run by the governor as representative of union under president’s rule. The onslaught is made by detaining leaders of all shades of state including more than eight thousand citizens , locked in jails out of state by enforcing curfew and placing inmates locked in houses, guarded by army personnel’s and blocking all communication channels since 4th August .

Constitutionality & Propriety of action

Article 3 as applicable to state , puts an embargo even on the parliament from “altering the name or boundary of state or increasing or diminishing its area without consent of the legislature of the stare”. It has changed the name , homogeneity , identity and status of the state and its subjects . It has changed the nature and basis of admission of state in the union through article 370 , which was held sin qua non of relationship of state with India by Supreme Court in several cases.

Court of India , hence beforeThough till date remaining a part of constitution, Article 370 is rendered redundant . It has changed the basic structure of constitution of India , which is never allowed by the Supreme. If the brute nationalism and vandalism of Modi does not overwhelm Supreme Court judges , the 5th August actions cannot stand the test of constitutionality.

The writer is a retired justice